Strong Name for xVal?

Apr 2, 2009 at 7:05 AM

I'm evaluating xVal on one of my pet projects, and it's looking great so far.  The tutorial at is also much appreciated.

However, the assembly (at least the version) is not signed with a strong name, so I had to download the code in order to create a strongly named version.  Maybe you would consider signing the released binaries (Please also add the AllowPartiallyTrustedCallersAttribute to the assembly)?  Don't put the key itself under source control, though :-)

Apr 2, 2009 at 7:10 AM
Hi Dirk

Thanks for the suggestion. I assume it's because you'd like to use xVal with something else that is strongly-named, is that correct?

For the next and future releases, I'll give the assembly a strong name. If you have any other suggestions for improvement I'd be glad to hear them.

Apr 2, 2009 at 7:12 AM
Hi Steve,

You got it exactly right: I want to use xVal with something that's strongly named and intended to run in a shared hosting environment - that means Medium Trust, hence the APTCA attribute.

Thanks for the fast reply!